03.08.2025, Aleksandrovskoye.
There is a theory that the new US administration’s goal is to divide Europe by forming a right-wing bloc led by Germany, including Italy, Austria, Hungary, and various other countries, and to oppose it with a liberal bloc led by France and Eurocrats.
We have repeatedly discussed the topic of neo-Nazi revenge in the West in the pages of our newspaper. Donald Trump’s triumphant return to power in the US has clearly spurred the activity of right-wing parties in Europe, which are dressing themselves up as conservatives. The population, tired of the liberal agenda with its “green transition,” the promotion of LGBT ideology (an organization whose activities are banned in Russia), and other dehumanizing technologies, has naturally turned to the right, who promise to rein in unruly migrants, put an end to gender confusion, and somehow solve economic problems.
A number of experts are already openly discussing the project of the so-called Black International — an alliance of European fascist or fascist-leaning (in its slightly revamped form) parties. Steve Bannon, a right-wing ideologue and advisor to Trump during his first term in the White House, is considered to be the author of the project and has been heavily involved in its organization. However, Bannon is currently out of favor with Trump, and the American media is discussing the takeover of this project by Elon Musk, who plays one of the leading roles in the new administration. In terms of his media activity, he is not far behind his boss, periodically provoking scandals and shocking the public.
So, his recent stunt—the highly emotional throwing of a “heil” at Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony—sparked a heated, albeit somewhat superficial, public debate. Without getting into the discussion, we will only note: whether it was a fascist salute, or a Boy Scout “Bellamy salute,” a symbolic “drang nach Mars,” or something else, such as a secret signal to the aforementioned fascist international to launch a new “Barbarossa” plan — Musk’s stunt was a resounding success.
Even more scandalous, especially in conjunction with the “heil” demonstrated at the inauguration, was Musk’s online appearance at a pre-election event of the right-wing populist German party Alternative for Germany (AfD), held on January 25 in the eastern German city of Halle. Clearly referring to the Nazi period in German history (what else could it be?), the head of the Trump administration’s newly created Office of Management and Budget (his smiling face was projected onto a huge screen at that moment) told a roaring crowd of AfD supporters that “children should not be guilty of the sins of their parents, let alone their great-grandmothers and great-grandfathers.”
“Too much attention is paid to guilt for past actions, and we need to get rid of it,” he added.
Reiterating the party’s position on Germany’s past, the world’s richest man supported the party, whose co-founder, Alexander Gauland, once called the Nazi era “just a bird dropping on the canvas of more than 1,000 years of successful German history.”
This obviously provocative statement caused not only a storm of indignation, but also a flood of publications devoted to searching for Musk’s Nazi background. Once again, the press and the internet began to actively discuss his German roots, his childhood spent in South Africa before the fall of apartheid, and, of course, the far-right views of his maternal grandfather, who was a member of a party that sympathized with Hitler. As they say, the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
In this article, we will familiarize the reader with some of the details outlined in these publications, but for now, let us note that if Musk is indeed a supporter of some form of neo-Nazism, then after such an information explosion, his popularity and authority in the relevant circles will increase dramatically. This means that it will be much easier for him to cultivate right-wingers in Europe, as his fame precedes him.
While the new US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, who has Cuban roots, is focused on Latin America, interaction with the European right wing, most of whom are currently in opposition, has clearly been left to Musk and his team.
Musk’s activity in US foreign policy toward Europe is off the charts. In the UK, he supported the right-wing Reform Party, led by Nigel Farage, which is gaining ground amid the utter incompetence of the Tories and Labour. We wrote above about his scandalous flirtations with Germany’s Alternative for Germany, which is gaining increasing support in the country. In Italy, Musk befriended Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, head of the ruling right-wing coalition. The beginning of her political career is associated with the youth wing of the Italian Social Movement (ISD), founded by veterans of Benito Mussolini’s fascist party.
It is symbolic that Meloni was the only current European leader invited to Trump’s inauguration. Neither European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, nor French President Emmanuel Macron attended the ceremony. Trump and Musk will build relations with them on completely different principles. There is a theory that the new US administration’s task is to divide Europe by gathering a right-wing bloc led by Germany, including Italy, Austria, Hungary, and various smaller countries, and to oppose it with a liberal bloc led by France and Eurocrats. This is a scheme that has long been tried and tested by the Brits.
It is also interesting to note that at the end of January, after Trump’s inauguration, Elon Musk’s younger brother Kimball, together with the head of Tesla’s Italian division Andrea Stroppa, visited the Italian government’s residence, Palazzo Chigi. According to Italian media reports, Kimball and Stroppa spoke for almost an hour with Italian Minister of Culture Alessandro Giuli, who flatly refused to disclose the content of the conversation, saying only that it concerned “various projects.”
Incidentally, at the age of 14, like Meloni, Giuli joined the Youth Front of the ISD, which means that in a sense he is cut from the same cloth as Meloni and, oddly enough, Musk.
So, what is this cloth, and why did Elon Musk become the unofficial curator of the European direction of American politics?
It is known that SpaceX, founded by Elon Musk in 2002, aims to make flights to Mars as cheap as possible and to establish a colony there. As of the end of 2024, SpaceX is the dominant provider of space services, significantly ahead of all its competitors, both private and public, in terms of the number of launches.
As stated on the SpaceX website, the US space agency (NASA) and the US Department of Defense work closely with the company through government contracts. Translated into plain English, this means that SpaceX lives off NASA and Pentagon money. And in a sense, it is controlled from there.
Here, it is necessary to mention a number of circumstances that are fundamentally important to the topic we are discussing.
Circumstance #1. The successes of NASA and the US space program since the 1960s have been made possible in large part by the experience and talent of Nazi criminal and SS officer Wernher von Braun. As part of Operation Paperclip, Wernher von Braun, along with a large group of German technical specialists, was brought to the US to work. In 1955, he received American citizenship.
On April 12, 1961, Sergey Korolev sent Yury Gagarin on a full orbital flight aboard Vostok. Less than a month later, on May 5, 1961, Wernher von Braun’s Redstone rocket made its first suborbital flight with astronaut Alan Shepard on board. No matter how fast the Americans tried, the Russians were the first to go into space.
After this annoying defeat, the US decided to beat the Soviets by landing on the moon. It was von Braun who headed NASA’s lunar program, and the Apollo spacecraft developed under his leadership took Americans to the moon — an achievement that no one has been able to repeat to this day, for some reason (I wonder why?), including the US itself.
There is still debate as to whether the landing was real or not. But there is no doubt among researchers that von Braun was the head of NASA’s space programs for a long time and, along with technical developments, was involved in indoctrinating his staff with occult Nazi ideas.
Let us stress that von Braun wanted more than just to claim the Moon for the Americans — by creating a lunar base, he planned to fly to Mars. Thus, Musk and his SpaceX are, in fact, continuing von Braun’s work.
Of course, it would be foolish to claim that the idea of flying to Mars is inherently Nazi. And that dreaming of flying to Mars or the Moon makes Musk a Nazi. So here we move on to circumstance #2.
Have you ever wondered where the name “Elon” came from? Musk’s official biography states that he was named after his maternal great-grandfather, John Elon Haldeman (1871–1909, USA).
But according to his father, Errol Musk (as he himself says in a video posted on August 1, 2022, on his official channel), he named Elon after the head of the Martian government from Wernher von Braun’s novel The Martian Project! In this work, von Braun described how Mars would be colonized in the future and named the ruler of the Martian government Elon (although in the novel it is not a personal name but a title, which does not change the essence of the matter).
Incidentally, Elon Musk himself periodically builds bridges to von Braun, calling him almost his guru, and to Mars, naming himself its emperor in 2021… In other words, his father’s obsession with Mars and von Braun really resonated with his son.
According to Errol, as a teenager, he was very interested in space and read a lot of relevant literature. This included books by Hermann Obert, a pioneer of space travel and rocket science in Germany, and his student, Wernher von Braun. It is more than logical to assume that Elon Musk’s fascination with space was instilled in him by his father, who in turn was inspired by von Braun’s books.
Musk senior says that he did not even know that such a name really existed until he learned about his wife’s grandfather’s middle name. That’s when he named his son Elon. As an adult, Errol Musk became an electrical engineer and was fascinated by technology his entire life. In fact, in those years (Errol was born in 1946), the whole world was crazy about space and flights to the Moon and Mars. So, there is nothing unusual about his fascination with space.
But there is a nuance, which is circumstance #3.
Von Braun originally wrote his science fiction novel Marsprojekt in the United States in 1948–1949 in the German language. It consisted of two parts: a fictional storyline and an appendix with calculations for a flight to the Red Planet. In 1950, Henry J. White translated Marsprojekt into English in its entirety, including both parts, although it would have seemed logical to keep the technical details and calculations secret so as not to give such an advantage to competitors. The Pentagon approved the publication of the entire novel, but all 18 publishers that von Braun approached refused to publish it for some reason.
In 1952, the technical appendix to Marsprojekt was published in German by Umschau Verlag under the title Das Marsprojekt. A year later, it was published in English by the University of Illinois Press under the title “The Mars Project.”
All well and good, but the word “Elon” does not appear in the technical appendix; it only appears in the 24th chapter of the fiction section, entitled “How Mars is Governed,” which discusses the colonization of Mars.
The novel was only published in its entirety by Canadian publisher Apogee Books in 2006, after which the book became a cult classic among the far right.
Leaving out other details, we note that until that moment, Elon Musk had no way of reading the chapter, because no one had published it. So how could a teenager from Pretoria, South Africa, have learned about the Martian leader Elon? Obviously, only if someone told him or gave the enthusiastic young man a printout of the locally self-published book. And here we return to his maternal relatives, the Haldeman family. This is circumstance #4.
Errol Musk met his future wife, Elon Musk’s mother, May Haldeman, when he was 13 and she was 11. They attended the same school in Pretoria.
May and Errol married in 1970, their first child Elon was born in 1971, and the couple divorced in 1979.
Each character in this family drama deserves a separate article, as the family background played a significant role in shaping the worldview of Elon Musk and his brothers. But for now, we will limit ourselves to the family of his mother, May Haldeman.
The Haldeman family moved to South Africa in 1950, when May was only two years old. May did not particularly like Errol Musk — she was repelled by his rude manners, assertiveness, and hooliganism, but in her biography she writes that she and Errol “talked a lot” at school and often walked together. A year after graduating from school, May received a marriage proposal from Errol, but she turned him down. Nevertheless, Errol announced to her family that she had agreed to marry him. The Haldeman family, without even bothering to contact their daughter, who had moved to another city to study, and check whether the suitor was lying, began to prepare for the wedding. So eagerly, in fact, that May, in her own words, was forced to agree, as it was easier than explaining why she did not want to marry Errol.
Obviously, the Holdmans wanted to become related to the Masks for some reason, or perhaps they wanted to get rid of May. However, the latter version seems too exotic to us.
May’s father and Elon’s grandfather, Joshua Norman Haldeman, is a fairly well-known figure in certain circles, arousing great interest among publicists. The Haldemans are a family of Pennsylvania Germans. These are German immigrants to America who moved there in the 18th and 19th centuries and have preserved their unique dialect and special traditions for centuries.
Joshua himself is half German, half Swiss, was born in the US (Minnesota), and lived in Canada for a long time after his family moved there from the US. He was involved in chiropractic (a form of alternative medicine that attempts to diagnose and treat people through manual manipulation of their musculoskeletal system, especially the spine), and his practice was one of the largest in Canada. His income from chiropractic allowed him to own his own airplane and a 20-room house, where he lived with his wife and four young children.
He was actively involved in politics, ran for regional and national parliaments, and even became the national chairman of the regional branch of a conservative political party known for its sharp anti-Semitism, the Social Credit Party of Canada.
The Social Credit Party (SCP), as the parliamentary party of the province of Alberta, was quite closely associated with local nationalists. According to a report in the Canadian newspaper Toronto Star, on April 6, 1944, one of the party’s events was held in Toronto, where Alberta Premier Ernest Manning addressed its supporters. The meeting was chaired by Joshua Haldeman, Elon Musk’s grandfather.
Anthony Glinka, an elected member of parliament from the PSK (1940–1949), who was also a prominent member of the Ukrainian National Federation, a fascist organization supporting the notorious Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (organization banned in Russian), led by Andrey Melnik.
Glinka, an anti-Semite and ultra-nationalist, was closely associated with the Ukrainian Canadian Committee, which was largely influenced by local fascists who, after the end of World War II, facilitated the relocation to Canada of a large number of Ukrainian nationalists from the UPA (organization banned in Russia) and the OUN (organization banned in Russia).
Ernest Manning and his predecessor as prime minister, Bill Aberhart, were well-known anti-Semites, and Manning advocated for the expulsion of Jews from the United States to colonize Palestine.
In the provincial parliamentary elections in June 1944, voters in the Canadian province of Saskatchewan voted overwhelmingly for the Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), which formed a new provincial government. It is believed to have been the first socialist government elected in North America.
In 1945, when Haldeman became head of the PSL branch in Saskatchewan, he became one of the most vocal critics of the FCC, claiming that the FCC was promoting “Nazi-Communist” doctrines, behind which he saw the hand of international finance, i.e., Jewish banking capital. This was a continuation of earlier attacks on “Judeo-Bolsheviks.” On June 13, 1946, in an interview with the Canadian publication Regina Leader-Post, Haldeman stated: “The goal of communists and socialists is to establish highly centralized control, backed by international finance. The FCS has been diligently promoting Nazi-Communist ideas since 1942. Every effort is being made to use educational institutions for propaganda purposes.”
Haldeman was also obsessed with the notorious Protocols of the Elders of Zion (listed as extremist material), periodically referring to it as proof of a Jewish conspiracy.
Later, Joshua Haldeman performed quite extravagant stunts in his public appearances (apparently, Elon Musk’s penchant for shock value and self-promotion came from his grandfather). For example, Haldeman, dressed as a clairvoyant, with a turban on his head and a crystal ball for predictions in his hands, stood in front of a PSK banner depicting a Celtic cross, which, we recall, was introduced into political use by Norwegian Nazis associated with Vidkun Quisling’s puppet dictatorship. In the post-war period, the Celtic cross became extremely popular among European and American right-wingers, on a par with Hitler’s swastika, and even more so.
In 1948, the PSK lost the national parliamentary elections spectacularly, failing to win a single seat, and lost ground sharply in the province of Saskatchewan, winning only 8% of the vote. Haldeman’s political career went downhill.
It should be noted here that before moving to South Africa in 1950, Haldeman had never been to South Africa and, as researchers of his biography suggest, moved there not only because of problems with the authorities, but also for ideological reasons — he liked the policy of apartheid.
“Instead of preventing me from entering South Africa, the government had the opposite effect — it prompted me to come and settle here,” he told a reporter for the South African newspaper Die Transvaler shortly after his arrival. The far-right Afrikaner newspaper called Haldeman’s arrival a PR victory for apartheid. “Praises the regime’s actions: Canadian politician settles in South Africa,” read the headline.
One must assume that Haldeman was forced to flee to Africa by accusations of anti-Semitism and the fact that South Africa, with its apartheid regime, offered a glimmer of new Nazi hope. Haldeman gathered his belongings and moved with his family to the country’s capital, Pretoria. There were indeed grounds for such hopes. For example, the future leader of the National Party and Prime Minister of South Africa during apartheid, B. J. Vorster, declared in 1942: “We stand for Christian nationalism, which is an ally of National Socialism. If you wish, you can call this anti-democratic principle a dictatorship. In Italy, it is called fascism, in Germany, National Socialism, and in South Africa, Christian nationalism.”
Shortly after arriving in South Africa, Haldeman wrote a long letter to the editor of the Saskatchewan newspaper Regina Leader-Post, in which he described his family’s new life, including the “previously unknown luxury” of black servants. In the letter, he praised the apartheid system and expressed a dismissive and even racist attitude toward the country’s black population:
“It is impossible to make a native work hard. It takes three natives to do the work of one white man, and white people here work about twice as hard as Canadians.”
“Black labor in South African industry is recognized as the most expensive labor in the world. Black men in their reservations do not work at all, and women may work for an hour or two, so the standard of living in their reservations is not very high, but they are happy and content with what they have, unless they are stirred up and encouraged — although this is almost an impossible task. Despite all the efforts of the communists, they have achieved practically no success. Any talk of a native uprising in Africa is purely communist fantasy or propaganda. There is no place in the world where natives are treated better and paid higher wages than here. Strict enforcement of the law is necessary to prevent natives from nearby territories from flocking here.”
Settling in 1950 in South Africa, which was oversaturated with convinced Nazis, Elon Musk’s grandfather entered into relations with the most right-wing part of the South African whites and began writing his numerous, but microscopically circulated, works, and at the same time searching for the mysterious city in the Kalahari Desert. In other words, Musk’s grandfather, like many in that milieu, was no stranger to mysticism and the occultism.
Mask’s grandfather most clearly articulated his beliefs in 1960 in a self-published book with the eloquent title “The International Conspiracy to Establish a World Dictatorship & the Menace to South Africa.” Its existence was first reported not long ago by journalist Jill Lepore in the well-respected American magazine The New Yorker.
And journalist and publicist Joshua Benton reports in an article about Haldeman published in September 2023 in the oldest American magazine, The Atlantic:
“Library databases indicate that there is only one copy in the Western Hemisphere, at Michigan State University, which is where I obtained it. In it, Haldeman wrote that there was a strong possibility that South Africa will become the leader of White Christian Civilization as she is becoming more and more the focal point, the bulwark, and the subject of attack by anti-Christian, anti-White forces throughout the world.”
“An examination of Joshua Haldeman’s writings reveals a radical conspiracy theorist who expressed racist, anti-Semitic, and antidemocratic views repeatedly, and over the course of decades—a record I studied across hundreds of documents from the time, including newspaper clips, self-published manuscripts, university archives, and private correspondence. Haldeman believed that apartheid South Africa was destined to lead “White Christian Civilization” in its fight against the “International Conspiracy” of Jewish bankers and the “hordes of Coloured people” they controlled.”
Benton then quotes a passage from Holdeman’s book that clearly characterizes his ultra-right views: “She [South Africa] will fulfill this destiny if the White Christian people get together; if they realize the forces that are behind these world-wide attacks; if the people will make a study of who are their real enemies and what their methods are; if she will seriously combat the evils of Internationalism that are already taking cancerous roots in our society.“
Given Joshua Haldeman’s very peculiar background and his obvious involvement in South African nationalist circles, one can cautiously assume that it was this involvement that gave his future son-in-law Errol Musk, who had been friends with his daughter May since school, access to Wernher von Braun’s novel “Project Mars.” Whether it was the English or original German version is not that important.
It should be noted that this historical excursus was necessary not so much to determine whether Musk’s father could have read von Braun’s book in his youth, but rather to demonstrate the ideological continuity between generations of the Musk family and its deep roots in a definitely Nazi worldview. But the characterization of Haldeman, and in a sense his grandson Elon, whom he clearly influenced greatly, would be incomplete without mentioning one more — the fifth — circumstance that unites all of the above.
Circumstance #5. While still living in Canada, Haldeman became one of the leaders of a very specific socio-political movement of technocrats called Technocracy Incorporated. Its supporters advocated abandoning the democratic form of government and transferring all power to “technocrats” — a small, technically skilled elite group that knows best how to properly manage society and distribute wealth. During World War II, the Canadian government banned the movement, declaring it a threat to national security. However, despite the ban, Haldeman continued to be active in Technocracy, which resulted in his arrest and conviction on three charges, which was one of the main reasons for his fleeing to South Africa.
What kind of movement is this? Renowned engineer Howard Scott, one of the founders and leaders of Technocracy, together with a small group of fellow engineers and scientists, made a peculiar “diagnosis” of the ills of civilization and offered a prescription for their cure. Scott’s Technocracy corporation called for the destruction of all current governments on the continent and their replacement with “The North American Technate,” a new organization to be run by engineers and scientists. (Note that North America includes Mexico, the US, and Canada, and recall Trump’s seemingly absurd promise to annex Canada and Mexico to the US. You must agree that the idea is quite in line with Scott and Haldeman’s concept of “technates”).
Calling for the abolition of all existing governments, the technocrats developed a so-called functional control system modeled on the telephone network and other large corporations. An example of such a system for them was the telephone company AT&T, which, as they noted, was also not a democracy. The “technate” was supposed to measure the total energy production on the continent and annually allocate a certain amount of energy certificates to each citizen, which would replace money. “It will be impossible to get into debt, and, accordingly, it will be impossible to save income for the future,” says one of the Technocracy brochures of that period.
“It would be impossible to sell anything.” That sort of radical rationing would be acceptable because—once scientific principles governed the entire economy, and the tech guys were running everything—it would become so profoundly productive that life would become mostly leisure. Technate residents could expect to work only from ages 25 to 45, and even then only four hours a day, 165 days a year. After 45 came retirement, when they could “do whatever they wish for the rest of their lives, and still enjoy full consuming privileges,” a Technocracy Inc. pamphlet promised.“
Elon Musk was only two years old when his grandfather died, and although there is no direct evidence of Haldeman’s influence on Musk’s worldview, the history of his family, which admired apartheid and racial theories, and the very atmosphere of apartheid and white supremacy could not but affect Elon Musk’s views. Indirect confirmation of this can be found in his own contradictory statements and actions regarding racial issues and freedom of speech on his platform X.
For example, on June 3, 2019, he wrote on his social media page about accelerating the development of spacecraft “to build a Martian Technocracy.” It is obvious that this seemingly harmless phrase is a reference to Wernher von Braun’s novel with its description of Martian society (a model of the ideal society that should be built) and the “technocratic” utopia that his grandfather dreamed of. And how, in fact, does techno-billionaire Musk, with his PayPal mafia and other representatives of Silicon Valley, differ from the “technocrats” to whom Joshua Haldeman proposed to transfer all power?
And didn’t Musk call himself the emperor of Mars, that is, Elon in von Braun’s terms?
Furthermore, von Braun’s novel essentially describes a fascist technocratic dictatorship established on Mars after some kind of catastrophe on Earth. Since the novel was written in the late 1940s, it is quite possible to assume that such a catastrophe could have been a nuclear war between the US and the Soviet Union.
It is curious that one of the most famous movies by American director Stanley Kubrick, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, satirically depicts the beginning of the very catastrophe from which it was necessary to escape. In the film, the solution was to seek refuge in underground bunkers, but given the development of modern technology, why not consider Mars? After all, it is precisely these ideas of colonization that Musk is actively proposing to today’s society.
Equally intriguing is the suggestion that one of the film’s characters, Dr. Strangelove, is a parody of Wernher von Braun. The film tells the story of the unfolding of a fascist revenge in the United States and how, after a kind of apocalypse linked to nuclear war, a fascist dictatorship will be established. Only those selected by a computer will be saved — individuals who are useful to the future society. The elite will not be subject to the computer filter — God forbid that the computer should reject a respectable person. In essence, this is a claim to power by the technical staff of IT specialists of the 1960s. In essence, Kubrick’s film describes a slightly modified technocracy. And now everything is moving towards a situation where artificial intelligence, that is, its owners — the technocrats of Silicon Valley — will evaluate and discard people. And the Social Credit Party can easily be transformed into a Social Rating Dictatorship. Because this is a megatrend shaped by the elite.
Whether Kubrick knew more than he could say, even under the fig leaf of satire, is a rhetorical question. He was a knowledgeable man with access to the highest echelons of the elite.
Yes, it is officially believed that Kubrick was inspired by Peter George’s book Red Alert, and he even began writing a screenplay for the film. However, there is no prototype for Dr. Strangelove in the novel; this is the director’s invention.
In our opinion, the above is sufficient to justify the hypothesis of a neo-Nazi project, with Elon Musk as its public face.
At the very least, there is continuity here: from the ultra-right-wing grandfather Haldeman, who consorted with Nazi circles in Canada, the US, and South Africa, to the grandson, who has made an incredible career in Silicon Valley, a “paradise for technocrats,” and who has real claims to political power! Moreover, he has already obtained this power in one form or another.
Of course, Elon Musk is “just” the face of a certain elite group that has put him forward as a player, like a joker in a deck of cards. Yes, he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and was able to build a large business, thanks in part to his relatives’ money and family connections, including in the diamond mining sector.
But this raises another question: could Musk have taken advantage of them if, for example, he did not share the views of those who promoted him and those with whom he built his business, who are now joining him in the Trump administration?
Musk’s ties to another tech billionaire, Peter Thiel, who is deservedly considered the “godfather” of the new Vice President J.D. Vance, require separate consideration. And the figure of Thiel himself. And here we come close to the question of modern technocrats, the concept of technofeudalism, and Silicon Valley as a project of the American military-industrial complex and special services. But more on that in the next article.
(To be continued.)
Source: Rossa Primavera News Agency
