18.09.2025, Moscow.
Lenin was the one who suggested that the ideological confrontation in Russia should be replaced with a police order, while masons from the Russian elite supervised from abroad dreamed about disintegrating Russia, the leader of the Essence of Time movement, philosopher and political scientist Sergey Kurginyan writes in his article On the Real Trouble for the Moscow State published in Issue 640 of the Essence of Time newspaper.
According to the philosopher, examples with which Russia today can be compared can be found not only in Belinsky’s letter to Gogol and in the Crimean War, but also in other moments of our history. For example, in the revolutionary events in Russia of the early 20th century.
The political scientist reminds that then, similarly to Belinsky in his time, Lenin suggested that the ideological confrontation in Russia should be replaced with a triumph of a police order over the corporations of thieves and robbers on governmental positions.
“Shortly before the shot of Aurora on the Winter Palace Lenin wrote an article The Impending Catastrophe and How to Combat It where he suggested that any ideological disagreement should be postponed for the sake of defeating the enemies of Russia,” Kurginyan notes.
However, no one heard Lenin, and he faced accusations of “the worse the better” kind of policy and for “ruining Russia” because he allegedly was a mason.
“A closer look at the Russian history provides irrefutable evidence that it was the masons, the most top-ranking ones, that wanted to disintegrate Russia, and that they had control centers outside our Motherland,” the political scientist stresses.
These masons operated in Russia “in some 1916” and they were controlled from abroad.
“It is exactly certain top-ranking masons that were responsible for disintegrating Russia, and Lenin had nothing to do with them. At least because he did not belong to the upper class solely inside which any mason activities took place. It is the upper class of the Russian elite that disintegrated Russia through the absolute power of thieves and robbers on governmental positions, it was the upper class of the Russian elite,” Kurginyan writes, and he stresses that they would have successfully disintegrated Russia. They succeeded much in this by 1916, they began to commit blatant outrages after Nikolas II shamefully abdicated, and they had almost completed it by October 1917.
As for Lenin, he saved our country from impending dismemberment, the political scientist stresses.
“This is an indisputable fact of our history. How he reintegrated it part by part, what he could reintegrate and what he could not is another question. But he somehow reintegrated it, and then he strengthened it. Later, Stalin gave that Russia an unprecedented strength of a super-power. A power it never had before. This is the only reason why the church not only survived in Russia (and it would have totally disappeared after the disintegration of Russia that was prepared), but also the patriarchate was restored, without which the church is an institute that very specifically combines a bright front with quite a strange inner organization,” he adds.
According to Kurginyan, our contemporaries should be grateful to Lenin, Stalin, and the Bolsheviks for establishing a great power. However, it can only be possible with at least a minimal feeling of historical responsibility and historicity of their being.
“Unfortunately, this is something we really lack again. And this is why we can see a shameful and doubtful anti-Bolshevik Sabbath along with glorification of the Romanov family,” the leader of the Essence of Time movement concludes.
Source: Rossa Primavera News Agency
