Kurginyan explains who destroyed Soviet complexity after 1991

29.08.2022, Moscow.

The United States, with the help of the Soviet homegrown gravedigger, which was the combined petty bourgeois, consumer, and criminal mobs, destroyed Soviet complexity after 1991, says Sergey Kurginyan, the leader of the Essence of Time movement, in the new installment of his original program Destiny, published on YouTube, the movement’s channel on August 25.

The Americans, after all this had been accomplished with their help, threw all their energies into destroying the high industrialization we had built differently from that of the bourgeois world. They were destroying that high industrialization above all else. That is, they were destroying those productive forces, the possession of which is equivalent to moving along the trajectory of progress. And that means they transferred post-Soviet Russia from the rails of Soviet progress to the other rails, which, by definition, can only be the rails of anti-progress, that is, the rails of regress,” said the analyst.

According to him, in public, of course, they said differently: that first they will destroy the alternative, that is, the Soviet progress, and since it had a complexity, its destruction, of course, will expose the primitive. But then, they said, out of that primitive would grow proper, non-Soviet, anti-Soviet complexity, such as in the United States.

That is, we will first dump the country to the level of Latin America or Africa, and then from there it will get to the United States’ level, and if it doesn’t get there, then to hell with it,” Kurginyan described the actions of the pro-Western reformers.

He notes that the American occupiers and their local polizei were enthusiastically destroying complexity, claiming that they were doing it because the complexity they were destroying was wrong, i.e. Soviet, but in fact they were destroying complexity in as such.

The deception of the new anti-Soviet ideologists was too obvious, claiming that the reform would first destroy the bad Soviet complexity, then clean up that complexity and form the right colonial primitive, and then the right complexity would grow out of that primitive,” said Kurginyan.

He said that the only thing that amazed him in those bitter years was the belief of not the silliest people that indeed first the Soviet complexity will be destroyed, and then from the colonial simplicity will grow something complex that is not Soviet.

One had to be, if not insane at all, then at the very least, obsessed with a kind of anti-Soviet westernization in order not to distinguish between the ‘falcon’ of new industrialism and the ‘heron’ of colonialism and regress,” the analyst noted.

Source: Rossa Primavera News Agency

Leave a Reply