Proposal for a new system to better isolate reactionaries by Honoré Daumier. 1870
(Links to previous Chapters are available here: Part I)
June 5, 2020.
The idea of mass compulsory isolation was first proposed 15 years ago by George W. Bush’s administration. The aim was not to protect people’s health, but to militarize society in the event of a biological attack and to initiate continuity of government, which would sideline all existing US official authorities.
I have already said that the social consequences of these quarantines, including the field of education, can be fantastically bad. Previously I could refer only to some private conversations that deeply disgusted me. And now I can refer to something else. On objective and open information, coming from the mouth of the author.
On April 15, 2020, Profil magazine introduces us to a very peculiar position held by Timofei Bordachev, the program director of the Valdai club, the scientific director of the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies of the Higher School of Economics.
I did anticipate, that sooner or later the position of our peculiar elite representatives would be brought to light. But I did not expect it to happen so quickly and so harshly. This is crucially important, because the virus is one thing, and the associated elitization of the world and the shift to a situation of super-domination and super-subordination (super-domination by a minority and super-subordination by the majority) is a different question. Thus, if the virus is of artificial origin, and someone made it for some reason, then there was a purpose to it. I can’t yet say why, but will cover later. Understanding this is vital because that is the very “meaning of the game.”
So, Bordachev speaks about a specific, but very important aspect of the post crisis changes – the differentiation of education. I’m not making anything up. And I’m not slandering anyone. I’m quoting what he said in Profil.
“There will remain,” says Bordachev, “tens of thousands of the select few who will have the opportunity to receive education with full-fledged social interaction, that is, face-to-face. Face-to-face interaction and education help to correlate your interests with the interests of the team. That is to develop as a personality and a leader. Online learning limits this opportunity. But there should not be too many leaders in society. Especially in the context of shrinking resources.”
Should there not be too many personalities either? He said “personality and leader.” So, should there not be too many personalities either? And of whom should there be too many? Formless sludge which will later be disposed of?
Meanwhile, the situation is extremely serious. The coronavirus itself does not exist outside of such ideas – outside of political plans, outside of military plans and outside of the economy.
On April 16, 2020, Izvestia reported that the sectors of the Russian economy most affected by the coronavirus could lose 17.9 trillion rubles, and 15.5 million people could lose their jobs, citing the analysis of the National Rating Agency.
Increasingly, leading virologists and epidemiologists reach the conclusion that official information on the coronavirus is not true.
John P.A. Ioannidis, professor of virology, epidemiology and statistics at Stanford University, writes in the Statnews,“Three months after the outbreak emerged, most countries, including the US, lack the ability to test a large number of people and no countries have reliable data on the prevalence of the virus in a representative random sample of the general population. This evidence fiasco (emphasized by me. – S.K.) creates tremendous uncertainty about the risk of dying from COVID-19. Reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the World Health Organization, cause horror – and are meaningless.”
Who is saying this? A professor of virology, epidemiology, and statistics at Stanford University, a citadel of American science and education. “The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population.”
On the scientific website Science Direct, a group of French doctors confirmed Ioannidis’s calculations, concluding that the mortality rate of COVID-19 is not significantly different from respiratory infections caused by previously known coronaviruses.
I will not say whether this is right or wrong. This was done by a group of professional physicians, and it agrees with the position of an outstanding representative of the famed Stanford. These are not random people, scammers or scandalists. They’re saying that the COVID-19 problem “is probably being overestimated”, noting that there are currently four common coronaviruses spreading, infecting millions of cases worldwide, often asymptomatically, for now with a low mortality rate. For now.
A group of Chinese and American virologists presented data from the Chinese city of Wuhan, where COVID-19 was first discovered, in an article in one of the most respected medical journals in the world, Nature Medicine, the case fatality rate in areas outside Hubei was 0.85% and 1.2–1.4% for Wuhan, which correlates well with Ioannidis’ data.
The British Medical Journal, referring to studies by leading scientists, writes that the vast majority of infections are asymptomatic. Sergio Romagnani, a professor of clinical immunology at the University of Florence, said most people infected with the virus do not show symptoms. Romagnani’s data are based on research in a completely isolated village of roughly 3000 people in northern Italy.
Is this Romagnani a scandalist, a fantasist, or a science fiction writer? He is a professor of clinical immunology at the University of Florence, one of the major universities in Europe. And he talks about specific studies.
Austrian doctors stand in solidarity with the Italians, Chinese and Americans.
The Center for Medical Statistics at the University of Vienna analyzed mortality data in Austria in the first ten days of April (https://www.vienna.at/analyse-zeigt-COVID-19-opferkurve-entspricht-normaler-mortalitaet/6581246) and concluded that the mortality curve from COVID-19 approximately corresponds with “‘normal’ mortality among men and women in certain age groups.” In other words, most people who tested positive for coronavirus and died, according to the Austrians, died of old age.
And now the Swiss. Reports of young and healthy people who died from coronavirus, upon closer analysis, proved to be false, said representatives of the independent Swiss Policy Research (SPR) group. Reportedly, many of these people either did not die from COVID-19, or they had serious conditions (for example, undiagnosed leukemia).
The British write about the same thing in The Guardian, and the Spaniards – on Gool.com.
I’m not contradicting the data from physicians, who are overwhelmed by who is actually filling the hospitals. I am not saying that COVID-19 is nothing serious. I think my job is to structure professional opinions and find out what is behind them. Sometimes they contain conflicts of interest, sometimes mistakes, sometimes excessively categorical judgments. But quite often, the professionals know what they’re talking about. And they are obviously being muffled. The Chinese newspaper “People’s Daily” asks the Americans: can you say why you’re forbidding your scientists to discuss COVID-19?
As for the increased mortality, for example, in northern Italy, scientists tend to see air contamination and Legionella, a bacterium that causes acute infection, as the reasons for this. Together with the low level of health care system development, insufficient care for the elderly, and panic, as significant factors.
The currently observed overload of healthcare systems in the US, UK, Spain, and Italy, doesn’t seem unusual, scientists say. In 2018, hospitals throughout the United States were filled with patients with the common flu; in Alabama, a state of emergency was declared in connection with hospitals being overwhelmed with ordinary flu patients. In the same 2018, intensive care units in Milan were completely filled with influenza patients. In Spain hospitals are filled with flu patients nearly every year.
So, what is really happening not just with COVID-19 mortality (which exists, which is terrible and not invented), but with the numbers on this mortality?
The President of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, Lothar Н. Wieler, said at a press conference on March 20, 2020, that the authorities officially consider COVID-19 to be the cause of death for patients in Germany who tested positive, regardless of them having other diseases.
Virologist Hendrik Streeck confirmed that this was happening in Germany, giving an example of a 78-year-old man who died of heart failure without even the slightest lung damage, but he was included in the mortality statistics for coronavirus.
And what is happening with when they say, “we have an exponential growth of coronavirus infections?”
The thing is that the number of tests in many countries is increasing exponentially. Swiss physician Felix Scholkmann tweeted relevant data for the US, Germany, and Switzerland.
The position of leading virologists found support from WHO – the World Health Organization. Contradicting its initial statements at the end of March, the WHO posted information on its website that there was no evidence that the virus spreads through aerosols. Leading German virologist Hendrik Streeck found neither airborne nor contact pathways.
A Zeit Online correspondent asks Streeck, “You said you took samples from everywhere, even from cats. Where were the viruses mostly?”
Hendrik Streeck replies, “Although we detected viruses on the door handles or in bathrooms, on the sink, we took these samples and tried to propagate these samples to find out if this virus can multiply and whether it will be infectious. And this did not work out in any case. But I think, on the basis of the results that we already have, the door handle can be contagious, only if someone sneezed into their hand and then grabbed the handle, and then the someone else touched it. But we were in houses with lots of seriously infected people. And despite this, we did not find a single living virus (on any surface).”
I’m not saying that there is no problem or that it is just fiction. I am not a COVID-dissident or a person who wants to call everything made up. I think that the key imperative for an expert at this stage is to endlessly investigate the opinions of specialists and arrange them into some kind of system.
The American physician Scott Jensen, who is also a Minnesota State Senator, spoke about the reasons for the frightening case statistics. On April 8, 2020, he told Fox News that physicians report COVID-19 on death certificates as the cause of death, which, in his opinion, “is ridiculous.” He says this as a doctor and a State Senator!
The point is, Jensen explains, that Medicare pays $13,000 for a patient with coronavirus and $39,000 if a ventilator is needed.
Can you imagine what that money means?
Jensen claims (no jokes, no chatter, and no conspiracy) that he received 7 pages of guidance, instructing how to fill out death certificates with a diagnosis of COVID-19 without a laboratory test confirming that the patient really had the virus. The physician should report COVID-19 on the death certificate as probable or presumed. Jensen demonstrated this guidance document on a live broadcast.
Did anyone look further into this issue? Were the authors of the guidelines punished? Is this happening in the US, but not here? There is a joke about how mom tells dad that their son is already big and needs to hear about how children are born, but this must be done very tactfully, using the birds and the bees as an example. Dad is busy with something, she interrupts him and says: “Go, explain!”
He calls his kid and says, “Come here! Remember when we were down south, and we went whoring, right?” He says, “Yup.” Dad makes a pause and then says, “Well, the birds and the bees do the same thing.”
In the US, this happens with certain “birds.” And the same thing happens in our country, adjusted for numbers and rapacity. Believe me, it is no less here than there.
I already mentioned Swiss, German, Italian, and other information that the initial assessments on COVID-19 were not entirely accurate. What about Russia? Are the initial views about the coronavirus situation changing? Surely. The more we learn, the more we change our views. Then we change policy.
And no one noticed this official message?
The Moscow Coronavirus Headquarters reports that 595 new cases of coronavirus were confirmed in the capital. That is all in Moscow by that time (as of April 2), 2475 cases of coronavirus had been recorded. Almost 46% of new cases were people between the ages of 18 and 45, 33% were between 46 and 65, and about 15% were over 65, with 6% being over 80. Another 6% of those infected were children.
But how does this information relate to special prohibitions placed on old people walking and so on? After all, it is the headquarters that sets the prohibitions and shares this information.
A few words on something indirectly connected with COVID, but crucially important. Even more important than the situation with Bosov and Bykov, because there everything is based on political tension. Here it is based on something that allows us to understand the meaning of the game.
On March 25, 2020, researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks issued a report on the causes of the World Trade Center (WTC) Building No. 7’s catastrophic collapse. The building, the collapse of which on September 11, 2001 was officially declared the first ever collapse of a skyscraper completely destroyed by fire.
Building No. 7 was the third skyscraper to be completely destroyed on September 11. It was part of the WTC building complex. A plane did not crash into it, nor was it attacked by terrorists. The steel-framed 47-story high-rise that could withstand a hurricane, a tsunami, and the most powerful earthquakes, folded like a house of cards in 7 seconds. This happened few hours after the twin towers collapsed.
According to the official version, the red-hot debris caused a fire in the building, which was impossible to extinguish. This is the version of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, as well as of the group led by then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. While the official investigation had already been criticized by CIA Veterans, the Firefighters Association and the Association of Air Traffic Controllers.
The Architect Richard Gage claims, “Never in history has a steel frame high-rise ever come down by fire. Even though we have a hundred examples, many of which are very hot, longer-lasting, and much larger than the fires in the three buildings we’re going to be looking at today.” And there, the source of fire that allegedly led to the building’s collapse, disappeared an hour before the disaster.
In the film “Rethink911”, posted on the eponymous website, there are such shots: on the left side of the screen we see how building No. 7 of the WTC collapses, and on the right – a controlled implosion of a building intended for demolition. Finding differences is next to impossible.
What is this university in Fairbanks that essentially challenges the official version? The University of Alaska Fairbanks is the largest university in the state of Alaska. It’s part of the University of Alaska system. UAF was founded in 1917 and began enrolling students in 1922. According to U. S. News & World Report for 2017, it is the only university in Alaska falling into the National Universities category (in this category it ranked 202nd in the world in 2017).
So, this is a very serious university, located in the boonies, which was given a quiet signal, “Hey, study everything there is on this fire! Honestly and to the thoroughly. So, we can get killer evidence.”
Who told them this? Of course, it was done by some officials. I think came personally from president Trump.
So, the National Institute of Standards and Technology has a version, which was considered official and the only one possible. The rest are fake. Now Fairbanks brought this version down in flames. Moreover, it was done by objective methods without any space for criticism. It is convincing to such an extent that one would find it difficult to deny. And it would lead to revising the entire investigation on September 11, 2001.
There are 7 months left before the election of the US President. The investigation of the University of Fairbanks may be one of the elements of a new campaign to uncover the so-called “deep state.”
Trump is busy uncovering it, not conspiracy theorists! Scientists do the same using objective data.
Another element of this campaign, according to Trump supporters, may become the Trump administration working with public figures and experts claiming that COVID-19 is a biological weapon used by US security agencies (this is what these Americans think) to ruin Trump’s election positions.
It means that, on the one hand, the version by Rumsfeld and his group will be debunked. On the other hand, the Trump administration may work with people who claim that the coronavirus was set into action by US security services… Do you think those who do this (who set the coronavirus into action), if they exist, can they remain indifferent to this? Shouldn’t they bang their fist on the table, prohibiting discussions on the nature of the coronavirus?
On April 8, 2020, ABC reported that US intelligence had already warned the White House as far back as late November 2019 of the disastrous consequences the coronavirus could have both on human health and on business. According to sources familiar with the report from the National Center for Medical Intelligence at the US Defense Intelligence Agency concerns about the virus spreading in Wuhan, China were already described in detail in November by security officials who “sounded the alarm to officials right here at home about a contagion sweeping through Wuhan.” The report’s authors came to the conclusion that the consequences of the virus “could be devastating.”
According to ABC, this information was repeatedly conveyed to the Joint of Chiefs of Staff and the White House. Multiple briefings were held for policy makers across the federal government through December. In January, Trump received this information in his daily briefings.
Here is your answer! “You want the Fairbanks study to show how bad a fabrication job the fire story was, you want to deal with our machinations regarding biological weapons? Then we will deal with you. We warned you in advance, but you failed to react, now we’ll see who comes out on top.”
On April 1, 2020, The Nation reports that the Pentagon warned Trump about the dangers of a pandemic back in 2017. I quote The Nation, “The most likely and significant threat is a novel respiratory disease, particularly a novel influenza disease,” Pentagon analysts wrote in 2017.
There’s this joke, one Georgian asks another,
– Hey, listen, guess how much two times two is!
– Damn it, Givi, you already knew!
The Pentagon allegedly directed particular attention to a novel coronavirus infection, given the history of previous outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China in 2003 and the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) in 2012.
So, did Givi already know how much two times two was? Or is he just wise and learned the multiplication table? The two versions are equally valid. But one of them gains a certain advantage in the event of certain specific political shifts occurring.
On March 6, 2020, Time starts discussing US Vice President Pence. “Everything comes to Pence” on COVID-19, a White House official says, and “he’s coming up to speed from zero.” Pence receives neutral or positive feedback from regional and other leaders, including Democrats. It is noted that Pence was brought in to fix the conflict between Trump and Fauci. It also says that Pence is in a tricky position: if he can’t manage the situation, he could quickly become fuel feeding the flames of dissent started by facing angry Americans…
But if he can, he will become much better than Trump. And much more desirable than Trump, for both Democrats and Republicans. Remember this figure – Pence.
On March 21, 2020, The Guardian joins the discussion informing readers that the vice-presidency is usually regarded as a thankless task, but like Dick Cheney after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Pence has found himself elevated by a wildly unpredictable event – COVID-19. Whatever happens in November, Pence is seen as a likely contender for the Republican nomination in 2024.
March 25, 2020 Gallup informs that in the approval ratings of US Leaders’ and Institutions’ handling of the response to the coronavirus for the period of March 13-22, 2020, US Vice President Mike Pence gained 61%, ahead of Trump with 60%.
Until recently, this was beyond belief. Pence was nothing, Trump was everything. And now Pence is overtaking Trump.
And on March 28, 2020, The National Interest began to lift Pence (this is a journal for both Democrats and Republicans, a kind of compromise). Pence is ironically compared to Eisenhower, which incidentally, makes him a possible Presidential candidate. The article says that they both have a singular, and indispensable, talent in common: both know how to talk to the press. (In other words, Pence contraposed to Trump, who says something like: “Why should I waste my time while you are attacking me and then write fake news? I’ll stop giving press conferences.”)
At the same moment, it is noted that Pence expertly provides a deft ability to convince people that he’s the most capable and informed policymaker in Washington, even when (manifestly) he’s not. Like Eisenhower, who met the press weekly, Pence’s talent is regularly tested – through his appearances at the now almost daily press briefings on the coronavirus. It is said that Trump didn’t appoint Pence, a self-described “evangelical Catholic” (pay attention to this definition. Evangelicals are Protestants. Note this and remember. I will discuss this later), because the Vice President believes in science, he appointed him because he’s underrated, unsophisticated and thoroughly boring (meaning Pence; because he does not believe in science. But does Pence believe in it? Why are they talking about it? Because he was underrated, unsophisticated and very boring). But it turns out, writes The National Interest, that compared to Trump, Pence is exactly what America needs.
Well, now let’s turn to something which can to some extent reveal the meaning of the game, that is, the background of all the strange micro-stories I’m referring to.
On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization acknowledged (I am simply analyzing the chronology) that an outbreak of coronavirus is, quote, “an international public health emergency.”
On the very next day, US Secretary of Defense Mark Esper issues an order according to which the US Armed Forces Northern Command should be prepared to facilitate the so-called continuity of government.
It’s worth talking about this.
Continuity of government implies the continuity of power in the event of a nuclear war, as well as the death of the President, Vice-President and Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Apart from the death of these persons, the basis for implementing the continuity of government plan is only the inability of these persons to perform the functions assigned to them.
According to the former directive of US President Eisenhower, in case of such collective incapacitation (which Eisenhower, of course, associated with a nuclear war against the Soviet Union), power should pass to the military commanders and be carried out with the help of a so-called multi-tiered reserve government.
Has it ever been implemented? Oddly enough, yes.
After the events of September 11, 2001 the very same continuity of government plan was implemented for 12 hours. And the power that was vested in the President and others, including the Vice-President, Speaker of the House of Representatives – was exercised by a different person. Although the President (and in 2001 it was George W. Bush) and other relevant persons were quite competent. Power was exercised over the course of 12 hours by a certain Richard Clarke, the National Coordinator for Counter-Terrorism.
Here we enter into the field of rather exclusive topics, where it is very important to leave science fiction and conspiracy theories at the door. Therefore, I give some clarification.
One of the most respected American journalists working in the field of military analytics, William Morris Arkin, has dealt with the problem of continuity of government for quite a long time. I emphasize that Arkin is not a conspiracy theorist – he is a respected military journalist and analyst who has successfully worked on this topic in three very authoritative US publication: the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post and The New York Times. Such papers do not hire analysts and investigative journalists who are strangers to the special services, and do not know how to receive special information, and so on. Bob Woodward, who led the Watergate investigation, was worth any CIA director.
Arkin has been doing this for twenty years. And there are people sometimes who start doing something and keep doing it for almost entire lives, and they are no longer even experts – they are even overqualified, highly qualified specialists, super-specialists.
This is how Arkin describes the seven types of this continuity of government.
The first – RESEM – is responsible for protecting the President, Vice President and their families.
The second deals with the protection of the Secretary of Defense and other national security leaders.
The third is the protection for members of Congress and the Supreme Court.
No one says anything about the fourth except its name – Octagon.
Nothing is said about the fifth either, except that this plan is called Freejack.
The same with the sixth plan – Zodiac.
There is a seventh plan of government – Granite Shadow.
This seventh plan of government, Granite Shadow, regulates the deployment of special forces in Washington, DC and the use of armed forces in the consequent situations. As well as travel through territories occupied by the military.
Now, the RESEM plan can only be applied in the event of the death of the President and Vice President or their inability to fulfill their functions.
But someone would have to put all these continuity of government plans into action. And this someone is the US Armed Forces Northern Command. Currently, this US Northern Command is led by US Air Force General Terrence O’Shaughnessy. Moreover, O’Shaughnessy heads not only the Northern Command, but also the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).
O’Shaughnessy has made a real career in the Air Force. He commands authority among the military, since he has experience of direct military operations as a squadron commander, and of all types of strategic command in the US Armed Forces.
According to US law, he would be in charge if the three main political figures are dead.
That is what continuity of government is.
Moreover, the Northern Command oversees not only the US but also Canada, Mexico and The Bahamas. And the Northern Command has the right, on its own initiative, to deploy troops to these countries.
The rights of the Northern Command and the degree to which these rights are exercised have been strengthened in recent years. In 2016 (this is not the time of Eisenhower), President Barack Obama signed Presidential Policy Directive 40 on the policy of continuity of government – the National Continuity Policy.
And two days before Donald Trump assumed the Presidency, that is, on January 18, 2017, Craig Fugate, the Director of the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), signed the Continuity Directive 1 on continuity of government. This directive clarifies the functioning of this parallel power structure at lower levels.
That is, this continuity of government, was not only planned under Eisenhower, but was further elaborated. And under Bush, it was utilized to a certain extent. This continuity of government is constantly being facilitated and improved. And this is big.
There is nothing delusional in the assumption that this parallel system of continuity of government can be activated with the help of an artificially created emergency – that same COVID-19 or something similar. For example, it was activated on September 11, 2001. And whether or not this situation 9/11 was artificially created is still unclear. So, there is nothing crazy about this hypothesis.
No one, I stress, claims that the US developed COVID-19 in order to implement this system of government. This is a hypothesis according to which COVID-19 can even be designed and introduced in order to activate this system, and surely it can become a natural reason for implementing this system. This hypothesis: a) is a hypothesis and b) is absolutely reasonable as such. And since the situation is surprisingly ambiguous, one shouldn’t neglect such hypotheses, or even more call them conspiracy theories.
What is a conspiracy theory? O’Shaughnessy? This continuity of government? And the 12 hours, during which this continuity of government had operated because of the strike on the twin towers?
But then tell me please, what is the Kennedy assassination? Is it a conspiracy theory or a particular special operation that significantly influenced the fate of the world? The answer is obvious. And how can one dismiss various bold hypotheses calling them conspiracy theories, while there are similar, undoubted situations that have remained unclear for many decades?
But how are these details relating to the continuity of government related to the coronavirus story?
Kaiser Health News is a fairly authoritative, non-conspiratorial, non-profit news agency, which announced during the Bush administration exactly what plans this administration was developing in the event (attention!) of terrorists using biological weapons against the US military stationed in bases overseas.
A specific total quarantine technique was proposed that made these US military bases impossible to eliminate with biological weapons. This technique was developed by the US Department of Defense together with the US Public Health Service. There is no conspiracy about it.
Later, in the era after the twin towers collapse, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, intended to extend a similar total quarantine technique (with experience in quarantining military bases abroad) on the entire US population. This request was given to Dr. Carter Mecher from the Veterans Health Administration and Dr. Richard Hatchett from the National Security Council.
Rumsfeld’s idea was to apply total quarantine, which was originally supposed to be used at military bases, in the event of a biological attack. The proposed plan is very similar to what is happening today. In order to initiate the quarantine, the corresponding instructions and plans were needed. I emphasize once again that this quarantine, which is being used against COVID-19 and which coincides with Rumsfeld’s plan, has never before been used for any epidemic diseases.
Who was the most active in promoting such plans and their development in 2006? The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And from this point of view, doesn’t Colin Powell’s vial of powder remind you of anything? Do any thoughts arise? Maybe some biological event was being planned even then?
The plans that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were developing were not adopted for execution, they were almost adopted, but they were put on the shelf thanks to the resistance from the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and personally Professor Donald Henderson, who led both the school and very serious US epidemic response structures (in particular, he led international efforts to eradicate smallpox for many years). Henderson and his colleagues raised a real rebellion against Rumsfeld’s, Mecher’s and Hatchett’s project, and they called this project the US administration’s final step towards absolute totalitarianism.
All of the official documents that existed on this subject were strangely destroyed by the Trump administration in 2017. The only trace left that allows us to consider everything not as conspiracy theories is that scandals occurred in 2006 that gave rise to a conflict between Henderson and the Rumsfeld group (Mecher, Hatchett and others). You see, it was leaked. Then all the traces were erased, but this is something you can’t hide anymore.
At the same time, one of the members of Rumsfeld’s group – Richard Hatchett – became the director of CEPI (the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations). It was CEPI that coordinated the development of new vaccines in the United States.
In the early stages of the COVID-19 response, there were two opposing positions – the position of President Trump himself and the position of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is considered one of the leading experts in combating epidemics.
Fauci demanded a plan against COVID-19, strikingly similar to the plan that was developed by the Rumsfeld group. But Trump resisted to the degree of his ability, protesting against Fauci implementing this plan, which is essentially Rumsfeld’s plan.
Then Fauci allowed confidential information about the so-called Red Dawn group to be published. The idea of the “Red Dawn” was promoted by Hollywood. It was originally the movie made in 1984, in which Soviet and Cuban forces carry out a full-scale invasion of the United States, resulting in a monstrous Third World War. By the way, in this version, China fight alongside the United States. But in the 2012 remake, according to the original plan, Chinese troops should have invaded the United States. However, China was ultimately replaced in the movie by North Korea (supposedly, the film distributors did not want to lose the Chinese audience).
But let’s return to the Red Dawn group. The main idea (attention!) is that China is not at all a power friendly to the US, with which they first fight the Soviet threat under Mao, and then jointly develop the world and share production functions. This is a “red horror.” Just like the Soviets were before the collapse of the USSR. This “red horror” – the demonized China, the Communist Party of China – was supposed to start a biological war against humanity.
This has all now been applied to the current COVID-19 scandal.
The members of the group promoting the idea of “Red Dawn” were Anthony Fauci himself, who headed the Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (we will talk more about him), as well as Dr. Carter Mecher and Dr. Richard Hatchett. These are the doctors who first announced the very possibility of extending the isolation plan for military personnel at certain facilities to the entire population of countries subjected to a terrible biological attack (attention!) by Communist China.
So, the idea of mass compulsory isolation was first proposed 15 years ago by the George W. Bush administration. The aim was not to protect people’s health, but to militarize society in the event of a biological attack and to initiate continuity of government that would push aside all existing US official power.
The first plan, I repeat, of a possible universal compulsory isolation was developed under the direction of Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld did not consider this plan to be local. He immediately gave it a global tone. He claimed that on the basis of such mandatory isolation it would be possible to restructure the entire global financial and production system. In such a way as to massively strengthen the position of the United States. Because after this isolation, a new life would begin and the United States would again be the leader. And without this, leadership can be lost. Now that China has leadership ambitions.
What exactly was intended? The global compulsory isolation was supposed to launch an even greater specialization of the global economy. That the US would grab the most profitable piece. Several other pieces will be given to peripheral countries. And all the rest would be thrown overboard.
Rumsfeld entrusted the development of his ideas to none other than to the pharmaceutical laboratory Gilead Sciences, which was close to him. At the American Enterprise Institute’s Project for the New American Century (PNAC) team developed a similar idea.
The doctrine of the global division of labor, called the “Cebrowski Doctrine” is in the same ideological vein.
Vice Admiral Cebrowski is an outstanding American military intellectual, the author of a very interesting project of network wars. He is one of the well-known proponents of global restructuring, this “New American Century”, which involves the redistribution of productive forces in favor of the United States, as well as (attention!) the destruction of a number of industries with the reorientation of industry to arms production and the introduction of electronic total control over the population through mobile phones.
We emphasize once again that one of the main tasks of the group, which began its activities more than a decade ago, is to place all responsibility on China. Notably it is about responsibility for a major biological disaster, allegedly specially carried out by China in the framework of a biological war. This implies punishing China and restructuring the world.
This plan involves expanding NATO into Southeast Asia. And there is another interesting point, which in its cynicism cannot be compared to what our cynics perform. The point is the following: to make pharmaceutical companies the media’s unofficial financial donors. Previously, mainly oil companies served this role.
Exposing this background to what is unfolding can hardly be considered the construction of another conspiracy myth. Everything that a myth should not contain is here: Multitudes of people, multitudes of documents, many investigators, the status of these investigators and so on. Are we going to call all of Woodward’s books a myth? All these continuity of government plans – Granite Shadow and so on – are they myths? No, my friends.
The number of leaks with information about this background is quite large. I can’t list every single one here. The information was provided by fairly authoritative sources. It was not all dumped out now, in close anticipation of the unfolding events. It was made public a long time ago.
By virtue of my first specialty, I approach any alarmism regarding the electronic enslavement of humanity, carried out on some pretext or another, with skepticism. And not because I think such enslavement is incompatible the moral character of our elite or the world elites. I repeat once again: I believe, these elites are capable of breaking any taboo. It does not, however, yet have the necessary intellectual potential for this. That’s what I thought before I became acquainted with the misfortunes of a certain Dr. Lieber.
Charles M. Lieber is Chair of the Department of Chemistry at Harvard University. He is one of the most influential specialists in the field of chemistry and nano-chemistry. Lieber has received 11 prestigious awards and is a member of 18 high-status academies and scientific organizations.
Professor Charles Lieber was arrested by the FBI on charges of criminal contacts with Chinese authorities. Lieber is 61. He is the creator of nanowires that can completely transform electronics, and nanoelectronic sensors that can detect individual virus particles, as well as cellular materials that can be embedded in separate parts of the brain in order to better understand brain function and treat diseases and brain injury.
Lieber’s laboratory received grants from the US Department of Health, as well as grants from the US Air Force and the Navy.
At the same time, Lieber received large sums of money from the Wuhan University of Technology as part of the Chinese government’s Thousand Talents Plan (TTP). Lieber is accused of hiding the receipt of these funds, while US military organizations were among his clients.
That is, Lieber is suspected of transferring biological weapons to China. Including the virus that causes COVID-19.
Lieber worked in China for 5 years. His salary there was $200,000 a year, plus a million from grants. Since he also worked for the Pentagon, the FBI accused Lieber of involvement with Chinese intelligence.
Lieber’s Harvard colleagues say that he worked on things worse than the coronavirus. Specifically – virus-sized nanorobots capable of controlling cells, bypassing the body’s defense mechanisms.
Lieber’s arrest is considered an important step towards escalating the trade and the espionage war between China and the United States. But the thing is not these wars, which are as old as the hills. It is about the capabilities that gentlemen like Lieber possess. And in the readiness of the powers that be to use them, without a moment’s hesitation.
Sophisticated people like Lieber with their capabilities exist, as does the willingness to use these capabilities. That is the threat to humanity at the present stage. And if this is so, then one can’t just dismiss any interpretations of these COVID stories. Even if they seem overexcited, sensationalistic, exotic, or excessive.
You be the judge.
(To be continued.)
This is the translation of the second article (first published in the “Essence of Time” newspaper issue 380 on June 5, 2020) by Sergey Kurginyan.