05.04.2022, Moscow.
The moment of truth has come for India as it is leaving the USA’s orbit, and it now has to decide where to move, said political scientist and the leader of the Essence of Time movement Sergey Kurginyan on April 1 on The Great Game program on Channel One.
Kurginyan noted that the USA has a very strong intention to make India its ally in its confrontation with China. It needs someone as a friend against China. This is why the USA will try to use the formula “one plus three against two,” i.e. the USA and India against China.
“So if China becomes the number two global power, then the number one power, which the USA believes itself to be, adds number three, which is India. This is how they want to ally,” the political scientist explained the USA’s tactics.
For a successful implementation of this formula, the USA, according to the political scientist, relied on the traditionally complicated relations between India and Pakistan. Meanwhile, Pakistan is a subject of struggle between China and the USA, and it remains unclear which will win.
India, Kurginyan stressed, has maintained good relations with the USA for a long time, as it believed it to be more profitable and comfortable to it as it opens a way for development.
“This is why for a long time India, hoping to receive preferences for a while as China did, planned to develop further. It had a very warm attitude towards both the USA and Israel, with which it has always had complicated relations, because of the large Islamic population in India,” the political scientist concluded.
However, now India is leaving the USA’s sphere of influence, and it has to choose where to move further. Kurginyan noted that he has some knowledge of India, and that he participates in Indian foundations. And India, according to the political scientist, has always been cautious not to make its relations with China too tense.
“They do not want a conflict with China,” Kurginyan stressed.
According to the philosopher, the next question is whom the USA fears more, Japan or China?
“This also suggests that the straightforward world of ‘either with us or against us’ etc. is passing away, and in the matter of sovereignty, as the Indians understand, they have to be against the USA to be sovereign. So this is another diplomatic form of the same thing,” the political scientist concluded.
Source: Rossa Primavera News Agency
