The Habsburg in a vyshyvanka. Ukrainism. Chapter IV

(Links to previous Chapters are available here: PrefaceIII, III)

One idea from the 1920s is still alive today: that a pan-European transition from modern  EU democracy to some kind of pan-European monarchy is possible. And in the case of such a transition, the Habsburg dynasty is without rival.


Continue reading

Austria-Hungary’s contribution to Ukrainization. Ukrainism. Chapter III

(Links to previous Chapters are available here: PrefaceI, II)

It was decided to create a “Ukrainian” nation, declaring the national unity of the Ruthenians and the population of Russian Malorossiya.

The historic lands of northern Bukovina, Transcarpathia, and Eastern Galicia make up the western regions of Ukraine today. For many years prior to becoming part of Ukraine, these territories were part of the Habsburg Monarchy, later transformed into the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Let’s take a closer look at the domestic policies pursued by the Habsburgs in these lands. Perhaps this will help us better understand the processes simmering in the modern political and sociocultural space of Ukraine.


Continue reading

Poland’s historical claims to Ukraine. Ukrainism. Chapter II.

(Links to previous Chapters are available here: Preface, I)

This means that after the collapse of the Soviet Union the process of liberation of the “enslaved peoples” did not stop, but entered a different, tougher phase.

To understand the essence of Poland’s territorial claims to Ukraine, it is necessary to examine the history of Polish-Ukrainian and Polish-Russian relations in detail chronologically, as well as to familiarize oneself with the main concepts of Polish foreign policy. These concepts are named after the oldest Polish royal dynasties – Piast and Jagiellon.


Continue reading

Russian challenge or Russian response? Foreword to ‘Ukrainism’

1

Construct is not equal to history, it is a surrogate of history. The real history of Ukraine, being an actual history, still holds some surprises, bifurcations etc. Meanwhile ‘ukrainism’ is a construct.

 

Constructology is a study of constructs. Nothing fancy, no wordplay is intended with the term ‘constructology’. The naming convention stays the same for any subject of interest. The suffix ‘logy’ stands for the study of something. The subject being studied is specified in the first part of the name for a specific research field.


Continue reading

Ukrainism: Who constructed it and why? An overview of the scientific-practical conference

24.10.2017, Russia.

This is the translation of the series of the presentations’ summaries of the scientific-practical conference “Ukrainism: Who constructed it and why”. The conference was held in Moscow on October 11 and 12. It was organized by Essence of Time social movement and Experimental Creative Centre International Public Foundation.
Continue reading